Lyneham Village Online

'Focused on our village to create a better community'
 
 

Information

 
 

Home Page

  About Lyneham
 

Latest News

 

In-depth Features

 

Weather

 

Diary

 

Village Forum

 

About Us

 

Community

 

Entertainment

 

Information

 

Interactive

 

Leisure

 

News

 

Services

 

Travel

 

Directory

 

Advice

  First Aid
  Local Business
  Lyneham People
  Mailing List
  Newspapers
  On the Net
  Towns and Villages
 

 

  Add to Favourites
 

Contact Us

  Help
 

Search

 
 

More Information

 
 

Lyneham History Search more..
Roman Wiltshire more..

 
Local Towns and Villages - Index - Lyneham
 

Agriculture

Lyneham Manor

Bygones

Map of Lyneham

Census

Old Maps of Lyneham

Ecology

Parish Boundary

Farming

Parish Council

Farms

RAF Lyneham

Finding Lyneham

Roads

Gallery

Road Names

Geography

Roman History

History Search

Settlement

Inhabitants

Topography
 

Roman History

Aerial view of Farthing Lane Lyneham

An example of a Motte and Bailey

Bradenstoke Priory

Bradenstoke Abbey - Avon Vale 2006

Bradenstoke Abbey Tower 2006

Roman Baths Bath

Possible Mediaeval Pottery Site
There has not been that many findings of mediaeval activity around the Lyneham area but signs of a possible mediaeval pottery site could have existed owing to Kiln ash, iron slag, and quantities of mediaeval Sherds of the 13th and 14th centuries date being discovered when house foundations were being laid in Farthing Lane, Lyneham (SU/023789).

Many of the sherds were obvious wasters and suggest that pottery kilns existed hereabouts in mediaeval times, but so far no evidence of kiln structures has come to light. A small type series of sherds has been deposited in Devizes Museum through the kindness of the owner of the site.

It has been recorded that the Romans used to frequently travel from Colchester Essex, the UK's oldest recorded town, to visit the roman town of Bath. There has been some oyster shells being found at Bradford-on-Avon in a few of the mediaeval buildings, possibly indicating the travellers passed through this area and left their food feast remains.

A further interesting object was also recovered from the same area. This consisted of a small lead disc, roughly, bun-shaped and measuring 3 in. in diameter, with a maximum thickness of 4-1 in. It is pierced, presumably for suspension the hole, which has a maximum diameter of ¼ in., has been pushed through from the back.

A roughly circular area, 2 in. in diameter is slightly sunk below the top surface of the disc, and bears a crude and apparently meaningless device. This comprises a single arm or stein ¼ in. thick extending across the diameter of the recess; from it radiate at right angles, and on the same-side, two smaller arms each ½in long, and about ¼in wide. Two further arms of similar length and thickness radiate from the circumference in the other half of the recess towards the central stein and roughly at right angles to it. The back of the disc is flat and quite plain. A group of seven sharply scored lines, parallel to each other and each about ¼in apart is visible on its edge.

The purpose of the disc can only be a matter for speculation unless it was intended as a sort of rough potter's mark. It remains in the possession of Mr. L. V. R. Keniston, of The Bungalow, Farthing Lane, Lyneham. Site details have also been recorded on the Ordnance Survey 6in. maps.

There is little visible evidence of early settlement in the parish, although the name 'Barrow End' applied to an area immediately north-west of Lyneham village, suggests prehistoric activity there. Roman coins have been found near the site of Bradenstoke Priory and a hoard of Constantinian coins appeared at an unlocated area in the parish. An extended skeleton of unknown date was found near West Preston Farm.

Lyneham Camp, a motte-and-bailey earthwork of possibly Norman date, lies in the north of the parish by Hillocks Wood. Clack Mount, a Norman earthwork, rises on the Corallian ridge at its highest point behind alternate Bradenstoke Farm

Motte and Bailey
Earthwork castles fall into two main types, mottes and ringworks. The former are usually associated with one or more baileys or courtyards, whilst a ringwork generally stands in isolation. The term "enclosure" is preferred by some with regard to ringworks, but "ringwork" is now an accepted term for this type of castle.

A motte is an enditched mound, usually artificial, which supported the strong point of the motte-and-bailey castle, overshadowing the bailey or enclosed courtyard below. It is predominantly rounded in plan. The height of mottes varies greatly, the majority being under 5m, although a few of the sites built in the years immediately following the Norman Conquest are well known for having some of the largest castle mounds in the country.

A bailey could vary in both shape and size, and a castle could have more than one. There are, however, some mottes which never seem to have had an attached courtyard. We cannot be certain why this should be, but some mottes may have been built as fortified observation posts rather than for permanent occupation. Another reason might be that a motte without a bailey represents an unfinished castle.

Ringworks could vary in form, but were generally circular earthworks, each consisting of a bank and ditch, or they might be D-shaped where a natural scarp formed part of the defences, which is evident with the Hillocks Wood siting using the escarpment facing north . A simple definition might be that a ringwork is a motte-and-bailey without the motte, and as its rampart could enclose a large area, these castles did not always have an additional bailey.

Generally a ringwork must have been quicker and cheaper to throw up than a motte-and-bailey, and this factor undoubtedly accounts for such defences being built when some castles were first constructed in England and Wales. In these cases where the Normans utilised earlier fortifications, such as Roman defences and Anglo-Saxon burhs or defended towns, in the immediate post-conquest period, ringworks seem to have predominated. It cannot be a coincidence that when the Normans were endeavouring to extend their hold on south Wales in the early 12th century, many of the castles were ringworks. Coity, Ogmore and Loughor in Glamorgan, Kidwelly, Llansteffan and probably Laugharne in Carmarthenshire are all good examples of this use of ringwork construction. Here the Normans, during their advance and occupation, were deliberately constructing what they considered to be a quick and effective form of castle.

Fortified Manors
A manor was an estate held by and the principle dwelling house for a lord. Most of the time, the lands surrounding the manor were farmed and taken care of by people who owed the lord money or service.

Manors were sometimes given a kind of defense, whether it be a ditch, moat, or palisade. This was to protect them from damage from animals or being taken by an enemy. There were very few fortified manors before the 12th century, but by the 13th and 14th centuries it was becoming common for the King to grant licenses to crenellate.

Many private houses were fortified during this time frame, some to such an extent that they became known as castles. One early fortified manor house was Stokesay Castle. Fortifications were made by Lawrence de Ludlow, after receiving a license to crenellate in 1291. A moat surrounded the castle and the enclosing walls were 30 feet high.

Another foritified manor is Weobley Castle, located on the Gower Peninsula in Wales. It was built by David de la Bere in the 14th century, and had walls 7 feet thick. There was a keep, hall, chapel, and other features that you would expect to see in a castle.

It is believed that Thornbury Castle was the last fortified manor to be built in England. Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, began building it in 1511, without a license. Stafford was executed in 1521 and the castle was never completed. It was taken over by King Henry VIII who transformed it into a palace.

A license to crenellate did not mean that fortifications were ever built, nor do they indicate the actual date that a manor was fortified. Many lords received multiple licenses to fortify their houses, but they were never modified or built. Bishop Wyvill of Salisbury, for example, received licences for his house in Salisbury, four manors in Wiltshire, two in Dorset, and One in Berkshire. None of the structures he built or modified were defensible nor fortified.