In 1334 Lyneham paid the second
highest contribution in Kingsbridge hundred indicating there
was some prosperity in the community. The parish had 227 poll-tax
payers, the highest amount in the hundred. Five parishioners
were selected to pay additional taxes for the Royal Benevolence,
owing to their affluence.
The Lyneham estate paid geld* for 16 hides (a hide was around
120 acres) and 1 virgate and was worth £6. The size
of the estate suggests that it included the later manor of
Lyneham. At the time of the Domesday Survey the estate contained
enough land for 10 ploughs, and 7½ hides were held
in demesne. There were 4 ploughs and 2 serfs on the demesne
hides. Elsewhere on the estate there were 16 bordars, 16 cottars,
and 8 villeins with 6 ploughs.
(*Geld: A tax
paid to the crown by English landholders under Anglo-Saxon
and Norman kings. [Middle English geld and Medieval
Latin geldum, both from Old English geld, gield,
payment.]) Full Glossary of Terms: click
here
At this date there were 4 acres of meadow and 12 acres of
pasture, while the woodland was estimated to be ½ a
league long and 3 furlongs broad. The value of the estate
had risen to £10 in 1086. There was an additional half-hide
holding in 'Stoche' in 1086 which contained land for half
a plough and was worth 10 shillings.
During the Middle Ages the manor of Lyneham comprised the
property of Bradenstoke Priory in Lyneham, Clack, Littlecott
(in Hilmarton), and Preston, and was worth £18 6s. in
1,291. In 1535 the manor of Lyneham, which still included
Littlecott and Preston, but which by this date excluded Bradenstoke,
was valued at £40 I7s., of which £27 represented
the rents of an unspecified number of customary tenants and
£6 the farm of the rectory of Lyneham.
There were 211 acres of arable land and 78 acres of pasture
and meadow in demesne at this date. During the years 1538-40
the manor was valued at £14 0s 1d., an estimate which
probably did not include the farm of the rectory lands. At
this date the rents of customary tenants in Lyneham were reckoned
at £18 19s 10d., while those of customary tenants in
Preston were reckoned at £8 3s. In 1545-6 the overall
value of the estate was £46 4s 3d and in 1546-7 £48
17s 8d while the rents of customary tenants were reckoned
at £27 2s 9d There were apparently no freeholders on
the manor at this date. The total rents paid by tenants there
in 1563 amounted to £2 13s 1d
In 1793 the manor of Lyneham included 9 farms, namely:
Farm |
Owner |
Acreage |
Thickthorn Farm |
Thomas Large |
163 a |
Preston East Farm |
Thomas Henley |
134 a |
Preston West Farm |
Richard Laurence |
127 a |
Lyneham Church Farm |
James Pullen |
107 a |
Lyneham Pound Farm |
not known |
108 a |
| Lyneham Green Farm |
John Hipkins |
116 a |
Barrow End Farm |
Elizabeth Pullen |
151 a |
Mansion House Farm |
Joseph Large |
151 a |
Middle Hill Farm |
not known |
162 a |
All these farms consisted of practically equal amounts of
arable, pastures and meadow. In 1896 all these farms remained
with the Walter-Heneage estate at Lyneham.
1821
- 1822 Valuation Survey |
Lyneham Green and Barrow End Estate:
Total Value £7 11s. 11d |
Elizabeth Pullen |
5/17th |
John Hopkins |
3/17th |
James Pullen |
2/17th |
Jacob Henley |
2/17th |
William Smith |
1/17th |
Elizabeth Pullen |
1/17th |
Job Simpkins |
1/17th |
Jacob Gale |
1/17th |
Thomas Yeo |
1/17th |
Berrymans Timber Yard |
|
Farming
For more information on the farming of Lyneham click
here.
The Manor Land
Manors each consisted of up to three classes of land:
1. Demesne,
the part controlled immediately by the lord and exploited
directly for the benefit of his household and dependents;
2. Dependent
(serf or villein) holdings carrying the obligation that
the peasant household supply the lord with specified labour
services or a part of its output (or cash in lieu thereof),
subject to the custom attached to the holding; and
3. Free peasant land,
without such obligation but otherwise subject to manorial
jurisdiction and custom, and owing money rent fixed at the
time of the lease.
Additional sources of income from the lord included charges
for use of his mill, bakery or wine-press, or for the right
to hunt or to let pigs feed in his woodland, as well as court
revenues and single payments on each change of tenant. On
the other side of the account, manorial administration involved
significant expenses, perhaps a reason why smaller manors
tended to rely less on villein tenure.
Villein holdings
were held nominally by arrangement of lord and tenant, but
tenure became in practice almost universally hereditary, with
a payment being made to the lord on the succession of another
member of the family. Villein land could not be abandoned,
at least until demographic and economic circumstances made
flight a viable proposition; nor could they be passed to a
third party without the lord's permission, and the customary
payment.
Though not free, villeins were by no means in the same position
as slaves: they enjoyed legal rights, subject to local custom,
and had recourse to the law, subject to court charges which
were an additional source of manorial income. Sub-letting
of villein holdings was not uncommon, and labour on the demesne
might be commuted into an additional money payment, as happened
increasingly from the 13th century.
Lyneham's Common Land
Common Land is mostly privately owned land, that has rights
of common over it, and as such, current laws apply to common
land in the same way as to any private land. more..
|